Skip to main content

JusticeNews

ICE officer shot and wounded man during New York enforcement operation

DHS said ICE was seeking a man from the Dominican Republic; CBS sources said preliminary information indicated the wounded man was not the arrest target.

Justice Desk · The Wells Post

3 min readComments

A city street intersection in Marble Hill near the site of an ICE shooting.

An ICE officer shot and wounded a man during a federal immigration operation in Marble Hill, New York City, around 4 p.m. Thursday. The man was hospitalized with injuries officials described as non-life-threatening, while two accounts describe the arrest operation without resolving how the wounded man fit into it.

The shooting took place near West 225th Street and Marble Hill Avenue, according to CBS News. The New York Police Department said federal agents were involved and that the man was conscious and receiving medical care.

NYPD said its officers did not witness or participate in the shooting, a distinction also reported in an Associated Press story republished by PBS News. The department’s account separates its role from that of the federal agents involved in the operation.

The Department of Homeland Security said ICE officers were conducting a targeted operation to arrest a man from the Dominican Republic. DHS said an ICE officer fired a weapon and wounded a man.

Separately, two law-enforcement sources told CBS that preliminary information indicated agents were trying to take someone into custody when a different man, who was not the arrest target, was shot. That account raises a basic question about the operation: whether the wounded man was the person agents sought or someone else.

DHS said the incident remained under investigation. The sequence before the gunfire and the reason the officer fired are central to understanding how the encounter unfolded.

Who was ICE trying to arrest?

DHS described the operation as an effort to arrest a man from the Dominican Republic. The preliminary account from the two sources cited by CBS News identified the wounded man as someone other than the intended arrest target. The accounts describe the operation from different vantage points; they do not, by themselves, explain the relationship between the person ICE sought and the man who was shot.

That distinction matters to any public accounting of the shooting. An explanation of who agents were trying to take into custody, and how the wounded man came to be involved, would clarify the operation’s immediate context. DHS’s statement confirmed that an ICE officer fired, but did not explain what led to the gunfire.

DHS also alleged that the wounded man had ties to the Trinitarios gang, a prior arrest and a criminal conviction. CBS reported that DHS said the NYPD arrested him in December 2023 and released him a few days later. Those allegations describe the department’s characterization of the man; they do not explain why the officer fired.

What did witnesses and video show?

Pedro Almaraz, an employee at a nearby restaurant, told AP that he heard what he estimated were three or four gunshots. He said he saw a man on the ground surrounded by masked officers wearing vests marked with DHS insignia. His description is a witness account, not an official count of shots fired.

A damaged car at the Marble Hill scene, with the surrounding street in the background.

AP also described photos and video showing ICE-badged agents at the scene, including one carrying a rifle, and a damaged car. Footage showed NYPD officers carrying an apparently injured man to a police vehicle.

The distinction between what a witness heard, what images show and what officials say is important in an incident involving an armed federal officer. Almaraz’s estimate gives one account of the sound of the shooting; DHS confirmed that an ICE officer discharged a weapon. Neither detail, on its own, explains what the officer perceived before firing.

Free newsletter

Get the morning briefing

Start each day with the stories that matter and why — a short, free email from our newsroom.

Free. One email a day, one-click unsubscribe. See our privacy policy.

Who is investigating, and what are officials asking for?

The FBI said an evidence response team was responding to assist DHS investigators. DHS said the incident remained under investigation, and CBS reported that authorities were continuing to investigate. The FBI team was responding to the scene to assist DHS investigators.

Gov. Kathy Hochul called for a transparent account of the shooting. “New Yorkers deserve to know exactly what happened and why,” she said in a statement reported by AP.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani also condemned the shooting. “I will not stand by while ICE agents terrorize our communities,” he said in a statement reported by AP.

City Council Speaker Julie Menin called for a prompt federal account, CBS reported, and raised concern about fear and uncertainty among immigrant New Yorkers. For residents, the questions are not only about the officer’s actions but also about how federal enforcement operations affect people nearby and how officials account for them afterward.

CBS News’ analysis counted at least 30 shootings involving Department of Homeland Security officers during the second Trump administration. That figure is CBS’s analysis; the Marble Hill shooting remains a specific incident whose circumstances and use of force must be addressed through its investigation.

DHS has said the investigation is underway, while city and state officials have called for a public explanation.

Comments

Comments are written by readers. They are not reporting or opinion from The Wells Post.

Share your view on this story. Criticise ideas and public records, not other readers.

Most comments appear right away; some wait for a moderator first.

Community guidelines
  • Be civil. Criticise ideas, arguments and public records, not other readers.
  • No harassment, threats, hate speech or dehumanising language, and nothing that targets private individuals.
  • Don't share personal information, such as email addresses or phone numbers, yours or anyone else's.
  • Stay on topic. No advertising, spam or repeated posts.
  • Comments with links may wait for a moderator.
  • We publish comments as written or not at all, and we may remove comments that break these guidelines.

More in our terms and privacy policy.

No comments yet. Start the conversation.

Related coverage

More from Justice

More Justice