Skip to main content

PoliticsNews

Angela Paxton urges GOP unity in Texas Senate race against James Talarico

Texas PAC funded her ad and had spent more than $126 million on advertising to boost Ken Paxton, while her appeal emphasized party control over policy.

Politics Desk · The Wells Post

2 min readComments

Angela Paxton in 2024.
Angela Paxton in 2024. File photo by Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons (cropped)

Texas state Sen. Angela Paxton is urging Republican women to support the party’s full ticket as Ken Paxton faces Democrat James Talarico in a Texas Senate race that could affect control of the chamber. Her message is about keeping the seat in Republican hands, not about the candidates’ policy proposals.

A New York Times/Siena University poll conducted at the end of September found Ken Paxton had the support of 40% of likely-voter women and 51% of likely-voter men, TIME reported Friday. The figures describe that poll, not all voters or every survey.

Her appeal is about the seat, not individual candidates

At a mid-September gathering of Republican women, Angela Paxton urged the party to support its candidates despite vulnerabilities on the ballot. “It’s not the people—it’s the seat,” she said, according to TIME. She also warned, “Either we hold every Republican seat or we hand the future of Texas to the other team.”

In a direct-to-camera ad, she urged voters to back the Republican ticket, saying, “That’s why I’m voting for the Republican ticket,” TIME reported. The ad did not name Ken Paxton or explicitly identify the Senate race.

The Texas Tribune reported on the ad on Oct. 3, before The Wells Post’s Oct. 5 account of the financial pressure around Ken Paxton’s campaign. Angela Paxton’s speech came earlier, in mid-September. The chronology matters: her appeal is part of an existing push for party unity, rather than a new endorsement after that coverage.

A party message backed by major outside spending

The Texas Tribune reported that Texas PAC funded the ad and described the group as a super PAC affiliated with Senate GOP leadership. The group had spent more than $126 million on advertising to boost Ken Paxton’s campaign, the Tribune reported.

Free newsletter

Get the morning briefing

Start each day with the stories that matter and why — a short, free email from our newsroom.

Free. One email a day, one-click unsubscribe. See our privacy policy.

That spending connects Angela Paxton’s appeal to a much larger effort to keep the seat Republican. The Wells Post previously examined the campaign’s fundraising pressures and the projected effort to support Ken Paxton.

Joshua Blank, research director of the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin, told TIME that the ad signaled concern about Ken Paxton’s prospects. Blank said it could give Republican women uneasy about supporting him permission to vote for him. That is an interpretation of the ad’s purpose, not evidence that it changed votes.

Jill Tate, president of the Texas Federation of Republican Women, told the Houston Chronicle that Angela Paxton’s appeal affected women in her organization who were struggling with how to vote. Tate’s account describes her group’s response; it does not measure the ad’s effect on voters statewide.

What the appeal leaves for voters to weigh

The message asks voters to prioritize party control over individual candidates, but it does not lay out policy positions or explain how either candidate’s agenda would affect Texans. That distinction matters in a contest that could shape which party controls the Senate: the Texas Tribune reported that Talarico held a narrow polling lead and that the race could affect the chamber’s balance.

The political stakes may be national, but voters still face a choice between candidates. Angela Paxton’s appeal makes the case for keeping a Republican seat; it leaves voters to assess the candidates’ records and proposals for themselves. Texas voters are scheduled to decide the race on Nov. 3.

Comments

Comments are written by readers. They are not reporting or opinion from The Wells Post.

Share your view on this story. Criticise ideas and public records, not other readers.

Most comments appear right away; some wait for a moderator first.

Community guidelines
  • Be civil. Criticise ideas, arguments and public records, not other readers.
  • No harassment, threats, hate speech or dehumanising language, and nothing that targets private individuals.
  • Don't share personal information, such as email addresses or phone numbers, yours or anyone else's.
  • Stay on topic. No advertising, spam or repeated posts.
  • Comments with links may wait for a moderator.
  • We publish comments as written or not at all, and we may remove comments that break these guidelines.

More in our terms and privacy policy.

No comments yet. Start the conversation.

Related coverage

More from Politics

More Politics