Later updates to our earlier report confirm that Starship released all 26 Starlink satellites before returning to Earth. The spacecraft splashed down in the Pacific north of Hawaii about three hours after launch, rather than completing the roughly 10-hour plan; it tipped over and caught fire after landing, CBS reported.
Monday’s flight marked Starship’s first orbital delivery, but not a full-length mission or a demonstration of recovery.
One of the upper stage’s six engines shut down early during ascent, but the remaining engines carried the spacecraft to orbit, CBS reported. The Associated Press report carried by Courthouse News Service did not give a reason for ending the flight early or say the engine shutdown caused it.
What did Starship’s first orbital flight establish?
Three results show what the flight did — and did not — accomplish:
- Orbit: Starship reached orbit. Its first full-scale launch, in April 2023, did not, TIME reported.
- Payload: The spacecraft deployed 26 next-generation Starlink satellites, advancing SpaceX’s ability to deliver its own satellites to orbit.
- Return: Starship came down after about three hours, well short of the planned roughly 10 hours, without demonstrating recovery.
Starship is designed to carry satellites and be reused. This flight demonstrated delivery, not that the spacecraft can be recovered and flown again.
Why does the early return matter?
Starship did not attempt to return to its launch pad for a catch. The Super Heavy booster splashed down in the Gulf of Mexico, while Starship came down in the Pacific. The reports do not describe a recovered spacecraft, so this mission did not demonstrate reuse.
The deployment still adds to what SpaceX has shown it can do with its own launch vehicle: carry and release the company’s Starlink satellites in orbit. The flight does not establish how routinely Starship can make deliveries, or how much control SpaceX will hold over satellite connectivity.
The milestone also leaves public-safety and oversight questions in view. TIME reported that environmental organizations have brought legal challenges over hazards connected to earlier Starship launches. The reports on Monday’s flight do not establish what caused the engine shutdown or what changes SpaceX will make before another launch.
Free newsletter
Get the morning briefing
Start each day with the stories that matter and why — a short, free email from our newsroom.
What remains before NASA can use Starship for the Moon?
NASA plans to use a Starship variant as a lunar lander, but that requires further development, including a crew-capable lander and orbital refueling by tanker flights. Monday’s mission demonstrated neither capability. Reports describe 2028 as a target for a lunar landing, not a date secured by this flight.
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman congratulated SpaceX, saying, “Gorgeous launch, getting Ship to orbit and managing every step in a safe, responsible, and especially inspirational way”, TIME reported. TIME also reported that Isaacman said NASA was interested in helping Starship missions become routine. CBS reported that NASA is funding Blue Origin as another lunar-lander provider.
The next unresolved questions are why Starship returned early and when it will demonstrate recovery and orbital refueling. The flight reached orbit and delivered satellites, but it did not answer either question.
Comments
Comments are written by readers. They are not reporting or opinion from The Wells Post.
Share your view on this story. Criticise ideas and public records, not other readers.
Most comments appear right away; some wait for a moderator first.
Community guidelines
More in our terms and privacy policy.
No comments yet. Start the conversation.