Skip to main content

PoliticsNews

James Talarico’s Texas Senate absence: what the photos show

The campaign gave CBS eight timestamped images dated Oct. 1–8. They address where Talarico appeared to be, not whether he had the flu.

Politics Desk · The Wells Post

4 min readComments

James Talarico in 2023.
James Talarico in 2023. File photo by Larry D. Moore, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons (cropped)

New security-camera images add evidence about where James Talarico was during his Texas Senate campaign-trail absence: They appear to place the Democratic candidate at his Austin home on each day from Oct. 1 through Oct. 8. The images support his campaign’s account of his location at the recorded moments, but they are not a continuous record and do not prove his explanation that he had the flu.

On Monday, Oct. 12, Talarico’s campaign gave CBS News eight timestamped images it said showed him at home on those dates. CBS described the pictures as low resolution, with a brown-haired male figure appearing in different clothes. The images carried SimpliSafe watermarks and appeared to come from a backyard camera; CBS matched features in the yard to recent satellite imagery of Talarico’s Austin address. CBS News reported on the images.

The Associated Press separately reviewed images showing Talarico at home over several days. The campaign’s spokesman, J.T. Ennis, told CBS News, “Last week James Talarico was home in Austin, Texas recovering from the flu.” The photographs bear on the location part of that account, not on a medical diagnosis or its severity.

What dates do the Talarico photos cover?

The campaign said the eight images showed Talarico at home on dates from Oct. 1 to Oct. 8. That stretch followed his Sept. 30 appearance by video at a Hispanic Business Council event and ended before his return to a public event at Austin City Limits on Friday, Oct. 9. CBS reported that he was also seen at a concert on Saturday, Oct. 10, in San Antonio.

A distant crowd at a public event in Austin, with no individual identifiable.

Talarico attributed his break from in-person campaigning to the flu. At the Sept. 30 event, he said, “And last night it got so bad that I went to the urgent care here in Dallas and I was diagnosed with the flu,” CBS News reported. He had also said he was beginning to feel ill a few days earlier.

An absence from in-person events is not the same as disappearing from public view. CBS identified Sept. 26 as Talarico’s last known in-person event in Texas before the gap. His remote appearance four days later was public, but did not put him in the room with attendees; he next appeared at a public event on Oct. 9.

Talarico and his campaign have attributed the absence to the flu; his account of the illness and absence provides background to that explanation. The new images add a narrower piece of information: they indicate he appeared to be at his Austin home at particular times on eight dates.

What do the images establish about Talarico’s absence?

The campaign’s account is that Talarico was home in Austin while recovering from the flu. The images support the location claim for the moments captured, but they do not establish continuous presence at home or verify that he had influenza, how sick he was or how long the illness lasted.

That distinction matters in a campaign. Voters can reasonably want to know when a candidate was unavailable for in-person events and what explanation the campaign gave. That interest is different from demanding private medical records or treating an image of someone at home as a diagnosis.

The still photographs offer snapshots, not a complete record of a candidate’s movements or campaign schedule. They show apparent presence at particular moments on eight dates; the flu account comes from Talarico and his campaign.

Free newsletter

Get the morning briefing

Start each day with the stories that matter and why — a short, free email from our newsroom.

Free. One email a day, one-click unsubscribe. See our privacy policy.

What happened to the Ohio treatment rumor?

Talarico’s absence also prompted online speculation that he had received treatment at the Lindner Center of Hope, an Ohio facility. The center said he had never received treatment there. The AP reported that the treatment claim was false and that the timeline used to support the online allegation did not fit the evidence cited for it. The AP’s fact-check addressed the claim.

The facility’s denial concerns that specific rumor; it does not verify Talarico’s flu diagnosis. The Austin images likewise concern where he appeared to be, rather than establishing a medical explanation. Separating those questions helps keep political criticism from turning an unsupported health rumor into a factual account.

Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton challenged Talarico’s explanation. Paxton said, “James Talarico claims he was missing for 13 days because he had the flu,” and asked, “Who actually believes that?” CBS News reported. Talarico had appeared remotely on Sept. 30, although his last known in-person event in Texas was Sept. 26.

The Ohio-treatment allegation was rejected by the facility and described as false by the AP. Paxton’s criticism is a political argument about Talarico’s explanation; the photographs offer evidence about location, not a medical verdict.

Why does a candidate’s availability matter to voters?

When a candidate steps back from those events, a clear account of the dates and the explanation offered can help voters assess how the campaign handled the absence. That interest does not erase a candidate’s privacy or make illness grounds for speculation.

Talarico’s public timeline includes a remote appearance on Sept. 30, images the campaign says place him at home from Oct. 1 through Oct. 8, and public appearances on Oct. 9 and Oct. 10. The images make the campaign’s account of his location more concrete for several days, while the flu diagnosis remains the explanation Talarico and his campaign have given.

Comments

Comments are written by readers. They are not reporting or opinion from The Wells Post.

Share your view on this story. Criticise ideas and public records, not other readers.

Most comments appear right away; some wait for a moderator first.

Community guidelines
  • Be civil. Criticise ideas, arguments and public records, not other readers.
  • No harassment, threats, hate speech or dehumanising language, and nothing that targets private individuals.
  • Don't share personal information, such as email addresses or phone numbers, yours or anyone else's.
  • Stay on topic. No advertising, spam or repeated posts.
  • Comments with links may wait for a moderator.
  • We publish comments as written or not at all, and we may remove comments that break these guidelines.

More in our terms and privacy policy.

No comments yet. Start the conversation.

Related coverage

More from Politics

More Politics